Moderators: High School Olympiad Moderators, amfulger, Arne, darij grinberg, freemind, harazi, Megus, N.T.TUAN, orl, pbornsztein, ZetaX
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
 |
 |
Author |
 |
Message |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
iura
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 461 Location: Chisinau
|
The idea is very nice me
Consider a a positive integere a>2 and p_1<..p_k be all primes less than a.
Prove that A=sum{[a/p_a1*p_a2*p_a3*..p_al]} and a have opposite parity.
the sum is taken over all non-empty subsets {a_1..a_l} of {1..k}
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:18 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
vinoth_90_2004
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 302 Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
|
yes this one is really nice ... however did you think of something like this?
first we rephrase: let q1<q2<...<q(k)<=n be squarefree numbers less than n (including q1=1). we want to prove [n/q1]+[n/q2]+...+[n/q(k)] is always odd. (this is same as the problem, since if the product of primes is always squarefree, occurs once, and if it exceeds n then [n/product of primes]=0. the product does not tho include 1, and since [n/q1]=n, its equivalant).
next let f(n) = [n/q1]...+[n/q(k)], g(n) be the number of squarefree divisors of n (not including n and 1). write out f(n) like so:
5 2 1 1
6 2 1 1
7 3 2 1 1 1
8 4 2 1 1 1
9 4 3 1 1 1
105 3 2 1 1 1
etc.
now its obvious that f(n) 'increases' from f(n-1) for every squarefree divisor of f(n-1), 1 since [n/1]=[n-1/1]+1, and a further 1 if n if squarefree, so:
f(n) = f(n-1) + g(n) + 1 if n is not squarefree
= f(n-1) + g(n) + 2 if n is squarefree
but its also obvious that g(n) is even iff n is not squarefree. so thus f(n) - f(n-1) is always even. so the parity of f(n) is always same. Checking for some n we find f(n) is always odd, which is what we wanted to prove. [sorry if i didn't explain well].
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:18 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
iura
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 461 Location: Chisinau
|
Your proof is true vinoth and very nice.
My proof is combinatorial however.
I will post it soon.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
iura
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 461 Location: Chisinau
|
We prove B=sum{(-1)^l [a/p_a1*..*a_l]^2} has opposite parity with a.
Let's count The number of pairs (x,y) with 1<=x,y<=a and gcd(x,y)>1.
Let S_i be the set of pairs that satisfy p|gcd(x,y).
We must compute how many elements has the union of S1..Sk.
Applying Inclusion-Exclusion principle this number is B.
However if (x,y) is a pair then (y,x) is likewise.
So they group in pairs unless x=y.
In this case we have a-1 pairs:(2,2),(3,3)..(a,a).
So B has same parity with a-1 which implies conclusion
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:13 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum You cannot post calendar events in this forum
|