MathLinks Forum LaTeX Help AoPS Classes Books Classroom MathLinks Contest Math Resources
The time now is Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:07 pm
All times are UTC + 2
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
View previous topicView next topic
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
Author Message
iura
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 461
Location: Chisinau
Moldova, Republic ofUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#1
The idea is very nice
me

Consider a a positive integere a>2 and p_1<..p_k be all primes less than a.
Prove that A=sum{[a/p_a1*p_a2*p_a3*..p_al]} and a have opposite parity.
the sum is taken over all non-empty subsets {a_1..a_l} of {1..k}

PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:18 pm
vinoth_90_2004
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 302
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Australia

To rate posts you must be logged in
#2
yes this one is really nice ... however did you think of something like this?
first we rephrase: let q1<q2<...<q(k)<=n be squarefree numbers less than n (including q1=1). we want to prove [n/q1]+[n/q2]+...+[n/q(k)] is always odd. (this is same as the problem, since if the product of primes is always squarefree, occurs once, and if it exceeds n then [n/product of primes]=0. the product does not tho include 1, and since [n/q1]=n, its equivalant).
next let f(n) = [n/q1]...+[n/q(k)], g(n) be the number of squarefree divisors of n (not including n and 1). write out f(n) like so:
5 2 1 1
6 2 1 1
7 3 2 1 1 1
8 4 2 1 1 1
9 4 3 1 1 1
105 3 2 1 1 1
etc.
now its obvious that f(n) 'increases' from f(n-1) for every squarefree divisor of f(n-1), 1 since [n/1]=[n-1/1]+1, and a further 1 if n if squarefree, so:
f(n) = f(n-1) + g(n) + 1 if n is not squarefree
= f(n-1) + g(n) + 2 if n is squarefree
but its also obvious that g(n) is even iff n is not squarefree. so thus f(n) - f(n-1) is always even. so the parity of f(n) is always same. Checking for some n Razz we find f(n) is always odd, which is what we wanted to prove. [sorry if i didn't explain well].

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:18 am
iura
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 461
Location: Chisinau
Moldova, Republic ofUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#3
Your proof is true vinoth and very nice.
My proof is combinatorial however.
I will post it soon.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm
iura
Riemann Hypothesis
Riemann Hypothesis

Offline
Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 461
Location: Chisinau
Moldova, Republic ofUnited States

To rate posts you must be logged in
#4
We prove B=sum{(-1)^l [a/p_a1*..*a_l]^2} has opposite parity with a.
Let's count The number of pairs (x,y) with 1<=x,y<=a and gcd(x,y)>1.
Let S_i be the set of pairs that satisfy p|gcd(x,y).
We must compute how many elements has the union of S1..Sk.
Applying Inclusion-Exclusion principle this number is B.
However if (x,y) is a pair then (y,x) is likewise.
So they group in pairs unless x=y.
In this case we have a-1 pairs:(2,2),(3,3)..(a,a).
So B has same parity with a-1 which implies conclusion

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:13 pm
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
4 Posts • Page 1 of 1
View previous topicView next topic
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum

Created and Maintained by Valentin Vornicu - (c) AoPS Inc. 2004-2008