7 Posts • Page 1 of 1
 |
 |
Author |
 |
Message |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5214 Location: Ghent
|
A 24 Putnam 1996
Let is a prime number and . Prove that is divisible by .
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
darij grinberg
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Posts: 5806 Location: Karlsruhe / Munich
|
Re: A 24 Putnam 1996
| Peter wrote: |
Let is a prime number and . Prove that
is divisible by .
|
I will assume paragraphs 1. and 2. of http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=150391 (or http://www.problem-solving.be/pen/viewtopic.php?t=25 ) post #4 as known.
We have to prove that .
In http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=150400 (or http://www.problem-solving.be/pen/viewtopic.php?t=34 ) post #2, Theorem 1, I showed that . This rewrites as , where we are working with fractions modulo (what is allowed in our case because the denominators are integers satisfying , and these integers are not divisible by ). In other words, .
Now we prove a simple lemma:
Lemma 1. If is a prime and is an integer satisfying , then .
Proof of Lemma 1. We have , and thus
.
Now, is coprime with (since , and all the numbers , , ..., are coprime with since is a prime and ); hence, we can divide this congruence by , and obtain . Lemma 1 is proven.
Now, for every integer satisfying , Lemma 1 yields , so that becomes . In other words,
.
Together with , this yields
.
But
.
Hence, we get . Since is an integer, this means , qed.
Note that this problem also appeared as question 2 in the 11th Annual Vojtech Jarnik International Mathematical Competition 2001, Category I. See also http://www.mathlinks.ro/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=151379 .
Darij
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am Last edited by darij grinberg on Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:55 pm; edited 3 times in total |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ricardokaka
Hodge Conjecture

Offline Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 84
|
Where's the lemma no 2? , Mr darij grinberg?
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:17 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ricardokaka
Hodge Conjecture

Offline Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 84
|
We haven't any exact and simple solutions, example: the Darij's solution! I think that this isn't a hard problem and we can solve it more simply and purer! I cann't understand the termes, example: "p-ardic"... Help me, please!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:20 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5214 Location: Ghent
|
| ricardokaka wrote: |
| I think that this isn't a hard problem and we can solve it more simply and purer!
|
Then post your solution, please!
I also believe p-adic numbers can be avoided.
|
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:31 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ZetaX
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 21 Dec 2004 Posts: 6168 Location: München
|
Sorry, but p-adic numbers were never used in any of the proofs (even not in the linked ones).
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:39 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Rust
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 3695
|
| darij grinberg wrote: |
Now, for every integer satisfying , Lemma 1 yields , so that becomes . In other words,
Darij
|
I don't see prove. I give full solution at least 2 times.
Let . Then
Let . Obviosly .
Consider
It give , were .
Because , we get
It give 
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:20 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
7 Posts • Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum You cannot post calendar events in this forum
|