7 Posts • Page 1 of 1
 |
 |
Author |
 |
Message |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5214 Location: Ghent
|
A 71 IMO 1990/3 (ROM5)
Determine all integers such that is an integer.
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Rust
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 3695
|
Obviosly n is odd. Let is maximal prime divisor n, suth that and , then .
If , then must be .
Therefore from all solution n we get and find minimal solution (n>1) , Because had not another prime factors. And all solutions are and .
|
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:51 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5214 Location: Ghent
|
| Rust wrote: |
Let is maximal prime divisor n, suth that and , then .
|
Who says there is such a prime divisor?
| Rust wrote: |
If , then must be .
|
Why?
|
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:16 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
chien than
Yang-Mills Theory

Offline Joined: 22 Nov 2006 Posts: 975 Location: Hanoi National University of Education,High school for gitfed student
|
http://www.kalva.demon.co.uk/imo/isoln/isoln903.html
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:46 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
kimnimalar
P versus NP

Offline Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 36
|
| Rust wrote: |
Obviosly n is odd. Let is maximal prime divisor n, suth that and , then .
If , then must be .
Therefore from all solution n we get and find minimal solution (n>1) , Because had not another prime factors. And all solutions are and .
|
please write full, I can't understand vp(m) and others... what's mean this function?
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:36 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ZetaX
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 21 Dec 2004 Posts: 6168 Location: München
|
For notations, always take a look at http://www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?t=76610 .
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:51 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Rust
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer

Offline Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 3695
|
| kimnimalar wrote: |
| Rust wrote: |
Obviosly n is odd. Let is maximal prime divisor n, suth that and , then .
If , then must be .
Therefore from all solution n we get and find minimal solution (n>1) , Because had not another prime factors. And all solutions are and .
|
please write full, I can't understand vp(m) and others... what's mean this function?
|
Full solution:
Because for is odd, n is odd. Let p is maximal prime divisor of n and . Then and . If obviosly . Let .Therefore exist odd u ( - even if m>1 and odd), suth that .
It give . Because , we get . It give new solution m.
If , then , therefore .
Because , we get . Exactly .
From solution we get solution , suth that and had less prime divisors, then .
From we get ,... and . Therefore .
It give solution . If , then . Therefore we had not another solutions.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:09 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
7 Posts • Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum You cannot post calendar events in this forum
|