2 Posts • Page 1 of 1
 |
 |
Author |
 |
Message |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5214 Location: Ghent
|
E 16 MM, Problem 1392, George Andrews
Prove that for any prime in the interval , divides 
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
darij grinberg
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Posts: 5806 Location: Karlsruhe / Munich
|
Re: E 16 MM, Problem 1392, George Andrews
EDIT: An edited and extended (Theorem 1 generalized even further, Theorem 5 extended and proved anew) version of the below solution can be found here:
http://projectpen.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/pen-e16.pdf
or here:
http://www.cip.ifi.lmu.de/~grinberg/pene16.pdf
| Peter wrote: |
Prove that for any prime in the interval , divides
|
Nice and instructive problem. Let's generalize:
Theorem 1. If and are positive integers and is a prime such that , then .
Before we prove this, we first show some basic facts about binomial coefficients and remainders modulo primes.
Definition. The binomial coefficient is defined for all reals and for all integers as follows: if is a positive integer, , and if is a negative integer.
Theorem 2, the upper negation identity. If is a real, and is an integer, then .
Proof of Theorem 2. We will only consider the case of being positive (the other cases are trivial). Then, using the definition of binomial coefficients,
.
This proves Theorem 2.
Theorem 3. If is a prime, if and are two integers such that , and if is an integer such that , then .
Proof of Theorem 3. If , then , so that Theorem 3 is trivial. Thus, it remains to consider the case only. In this case, is coprime with (since , and all numbers , , ..., are coprime with , since is a prime and ).
Now, yields
.
Since is coprime with , we can divide this congruence by , and thus we get . Hence, Theorem 3 is proven.
Finally, a basic property of binomial coefficients:
Theorem 4. For every nonnegative integer and any integer , we have .
This is known, but it is important not to forget the condition that is nonnegative (it is necessary!).
Now to something completely different:
Theorem 5. If is a prime, and is a polynomial of degree whose coefficients are all integers, then .
Proof of Theorem 5. Since is a polynomial of degree whose coefficients are all integers, it can be written in the form with being an integer (not necessarily nonzero) for every .
Hence,
.
But for every , we have (in fact, for , this is clear since , and for , this is equivalent to (since , because ), what follows from http://www.problem-solving.be/pen/viewtopic.php?t=676 part a) because ). Thus,
,
and Theorem 5 is proven.
Proof of Theorem 1. We have , since yields .
Also, yields , so that , thus , or, equivalently, .
We have to prove that . This rewrites as . This is equivalent to (in fact, since , the two sums and differ only in some terms with indices in the interval , and these terms are zero, so we have ).
For every integer with , we have
(after Theorem 2)
(by Theorem 3, since and )
(by Theorem 4, since is nonnegative, since and )
,
so that
(since is even).
Therefore,
(1)
.
Now,
is a polynomial of the variable whose degree is . Thus,
is a polynomial of the variable whose degree is . Since , it is therefore a polynomial of degree . Since the coefficients of this polynomial are all integers, Theorem 5 thus yields
.
Using (1), this becomes
.
Now, is coprime with (since , and all numbers , , ..., are coprime with because is a prime and ). Hence, we can divide this congruence by , and obtain . As we said, this proves Theorem 1.
Darij
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
2 Posts • Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum You cannot post calendar events in this forum
|