6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
 |
 |
Author |
 |
Message |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5202 Location: Ghent
|
C 2 IMO 1996/4
The positive integers and are such that the numbers and are both squares of positive integers. What is the least possible value that can be taken on by the smaller of these two squares?
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
mathmanman
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1438 Location: France
|
The answer is :
Now, let us prove it.
We have :
So
But, this implies and that is, since these are primes, and taking and to be non-zero in and :
and
But, this is impossible, which implies that and are both divisible by and hence and hence
The possible minimum for is
But,
And, (today's a lucky day ), this necessary condition happens to be sufficient, giving the result announced in the very beginning of this post.
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:24 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ideahitme
Hodge Conjecture

Offline Joined: 28 Nov 2003 Posts: 85
|
Re: C 2 IMO 1996/4
| Peter wrote: |
The positive integers and are such that the numbers and are both squares of positive integers. What is the least possible value that can be taken on by the smaller of these two squares?
|
We characterize the set
Let . We can find positive integers and such that and . After solving the system of equations , , we obtain
Now, we have to work modulo and modulo .
Step 1. First, we work modulo . We need to solve the system of congruences
The first equation reads or . The second equation reads or . We apply Gauss Elimination. We compute or . This implies that . Also, we find that so that . We conclude that is the unique solution of the system of congruences.
\textsc{Step 2.} Second, we work modulo . We need to solve the system of congruences
The first equation reads or . The second equation reads or . Hence, we compute or . This implies that . Also, we find that so that . We conclude that is the unique solution of the system of congruences.
Combining results from Step 1 and Step 2, we can write and for some positive integers and . Now, observe that
becomes
or
Hence, it follows that the set can be represented as
We therefore conclude that the minimum value is .
Notes
In the solution, we met the systems of congruences. We recall the congruences from Step 1: , . There are many alternative ways to reach .
Method 1. One may use Brahmagupta-Fibonacci Identity:
Indeed, we obtain
Since , we find that is divisibly by . We now apply the following result with to conclude that .
Proposition. Let be a prime with . Suppose that is divisible by for some integers and . Then, both and are divisible by .
Proof. Assume to the contrary that at least one of them are not divisible by . Since divides , we see that none of them are divisible by . Fermat's Little Theorem yields that . Since or since is odd, we have . Since divides , we obtain
Raise both sides of the congruence to the power to obtain
or
This is a contradiction because is an odd prime. Therefore, both and are divisible by .
Method 2. We now work on the field . (Since is prime, we know that the ring is a field. We identify with .) The above congruences become
Of course, Gauss Elimination works. However, we offer an alternative way. Observe that
This implies that has zero determinant so that . We compute
If , then we also have . Hence, we obtain , which is a contradiction. Therefore, we get and so .
|
_________________ It gives me the same pleasure when someone else proves a good theorem as when I do it myself. <E. Landau>
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:25 pm Last edited by ideahitme on Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chan-Nor
New Member

Offline Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 2
|
Hi Ideahitme,
I'am sorry to say this but it seems to me that there is something wrong in your solution
Namely,
15^2 + 16^2 = 481
but
481 = 13 x 37
( and not as you write 13 x 17)
Thus we work modulo 13 and 37.
So, in Step 2 we consider
15x^2 + 16 y ^2 = 0 mod 37
and
16x^2 - 15y^2 = 0 mod 37

|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:48 pm |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peter
Birch & Swinnerton Dyer


Offline Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 5202 Location: Ghent
|
| mathmanman wrote: |
and
|
It took me really long to realize these were fractions and not L\'egendre symbols.
Just posting this for the next person.
|
_________________ Boo!
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:51 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
scorpius119
Navier-Stokes Equations

Offline Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Posts: 1678 Location: ..., PA
|
Now so we need the congruences
for each of . In each case, if divides , then divides as well. Otherwise, we get
We can check (using QR for example, or the long way... ) that -15 is not a square modulo either prime, so we necessarily find that 481 divides both . But in this case, if , then there is always an integer solution for , namely
In particular, there's a positive integer solution for , that is, , for . Since positive and divisible by 481, the minimum is .
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:54 am |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
6 Posts • Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum You cannot post calendar events in this forum
|